Jevons, M. P., and you may Parker, Yards. T. (1964). J. din. Path., 17, 243-250. Lidwell, 0. Yards. (1959). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 18,49-52. Real time, We., and you will Nichols, Good. C. (1961).J. shoot. Dis.,108, 195-204. Macdonald, Good. (1946). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 5, 230-233. Meyer, W. (1966). Zentbl. Bukt. PurusitKde., I . Abt. Orig., 201,465-481. Meyer, W. (1967). J. Hyg., Camb., 65,439-447. Nakagawa, Yards. (1960). Jap. J. wet. Res., 8, 331-342. Oeding, P., and you may Williams, Roentgen. E. 0. (1958). 3. Hyg., Cumb., 56, 445-454. Pagano, J. S., Farrer, S. M., Plotkin, S. An excellent., Brachman, P. S., Fekety, F. Roentgen., and you may Pidcoe, V. (1960). Research, N.Y., 131, 927-928. Parker, Meters. T. (1966). Into the “Brand new Scientific Basis of Treatments Annual Review” (J. P. Ross, ed.), pp. 157-173. School regarding London, The fresh new Athlone Force, London area. Parker, Meters. T., Todinson, A good. J. H., and Williams, Roentgen. E. 0. (1955). J. Hyg., Cumb., 53,458-473.
The brand new parasexual stage and its own use in genetic data
Pether, J. V. S. (1968).J. Hyg., C an effective d . , 66,605. Poole, P. M., and Baker, J. Roentgen. (1966). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., twenty-five, 116-123. Report (1959). Int. Bull. bact. Nomencl.,nine, 115-118. Declaration (1963). Int. Bull. bact. Nomencl., 13, 119-122. Statement (1967). Int. Bull. buct. Nomencl., 17, 113-125. Report (1971). Int. Bull. syst. Buct., 21, 165, 167, 171. Rountree, P. M. (1959). J. gen. Microbiol., 20,620-633. Rountree, P. Meters., and you can Asheshov, Age. H. (1961). J. gen. Microbiol., 26, 111-122. Rountree, P. M., and you will Freeman, B. M. (1955). Med. J. Aust., dos, 157-161. Ruys, A good. C., and you may Borst, J. (1959). Antonie wan Leeuwenhoek, twenty-five, 237-240. Seto, J. T., and you can Wilson, J. B. (1958). Are.3. wet. Res., 19, 241-246. Smith, H. W. (1948a).J. Hyg., C you d . , 46,7681. Smith, H. W. (1948b);Jp. Road. Ther., 58, 179-188. Smith, H. W. (1954).J. Road. Buc
Tarr, H. A beneficial. (1958). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 17, 64-72. An excellent. (1965). Vet. Rec., 77, 477-480. Wentworth, B., Romig, W. Roentgen., and you may Dixon, W. J. (1964). J. infect. Dis.,114, 179188.
Williams, R. Age. 0. (1957). Zentbl. Bakt. PurasitKde., We . Abt. Orig., 168, 528-532. Williams, R. Elizabeth. O., and you can Jevons, M. P. (1961). Zentbl. Bukt. ParasitKde., We Abt. Orig., 181,349-358. Williams, R. Age. O., and you may Rippon ukraine date-coupons, J. Elizabeth. (1952). J. Hyg., Camb., fifty, 320-353. Williams, Roentgen. Elizabeth. O., Rippon, J. Elizabeth., and you will Dowsett, L. Meters. (1953). Lancet, we, 510-514. Wilson, G. S., and you may Atkinson, J. D. (1945). Lancet, we, 647-649.
Hereditary Studies during the Micro-organisms DAVID A good. HOPWOOD John Znnes Institute, Norwikh, England We. Addition . 11. Segregation because Evidence of Simple Hereditary Control . A great. The genetic method of biology . B. Brand new recognition of segregation . 111. The basis out-of Genetic Mapping . B. The fresh new sequencing away from loci to your a beneficial linkage chart: multi-grounds crosses C. Linkagegroups . D. Hereditary great-construction . E. Deletion mapping . IV. Functional Genetic Assessment . An excellent. Prominence evaluating . Bplementation screening . C. Epistasis . V. Genetic Research from inside the Eukaryotic Microbes . A beneficial. General considerations . step 1. 2. Tetrad studies . B. Hereditary investigation specifically bacteria step one. Aspergillus nidulans . . 2. Aspergillus niger and other “imperfect” fungi 3. Neurospora crassa . 4. Other ascomycetes . 5. Yeasts . six. Filamentous basidiomycetes . eight. Ustilago . 8. Chlamydomonas reinhardii . nine. Ciliates . ten. Slime moulds VI. Genetic Study for the Prokaryotes . An effective. General considerations . step 1. Virility brands and conjugational mapping . 2. Transduction and you may co-transduction . step 3. Transformation and you will co-sales 4. Non-choosy data .
fifty 51 57 61 61 65 66 69 69 73 75 77 78 80 81 81 83 84 91 94
Watson, W
Genetic investigation particularly organisms step 1. Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium and other Enteric germs . 2. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and you can Ps. putida . 3. Bacillus subtilis cuatro. Streptmyces coelicolor or any other actinomycetes . 5. Most other bacteria C. Formal mapping strategies separate away from recombination VII. Genetic Studies inside Worms An effective. Standard factors . step one. Types of viral genomes 2. Great features regarding malware family genes B. Genetic research in particular viruses step one. Bacteriophages 2. Animal worms step three. Plant worms VIII. Finishing Feedback Recommendations .