Research was analysed playing with SPSS twenty five.0. First detailed analyses have been did, in addition to Cronbach’s alphas and you may frequencies. Binary logistic regressions were utilized to assess associations anywhere between gender, age, intimate positioning, that have an intimate/sexual mate, SNS put, sexting normalisation and determination to take part in sexting once the separate parameters, while the five sexting habits while the oriented parameters. Nagelkerke’s Roentgen 2 try regarded as a measure of perception dimensions. Every variables had been joined towards design on the other hand. The study was also stratified of the gender.
Incidence out of sexting behaviors
The most frequent sexting behaviors get (21.2%) and obtaining via a mediator (twenty eight.4%), followed closely by 3rd-class forwarding out of intimate stuff (nine.3%) and you will, lastly, sending (8.1%). Descriptive analytics are provided from inside the Table 2.
This new regression patterns had been extreme. Nagelkerke’s R dos is actually .42 to your “sending” model, .31 on “receiving” design, .23 to your “third-people forwarding” model, and .17 to the “finding via an intermediary” model (Table step three:
On the “sending” model, determination to sext (OR: 8.26; 95% rely on interval [CI]: 5.36-), which have a romantic/intimate partner (OR: step three.44; 95% CI: dos.25-5.25), using Snapchat (OR: step 1.87; 95% CI: 1.19-dos.93), intimate orientation (OR: step 1.77; 95% CI: step one.04-step 3.00) and age (OR: 1.36; 95% CI: step one.14-step one.63) have been significantly pertaining to sending involvement. From the “receiving” design, that have an enchanting/intimate mate (OR: step three.27; 95% CI: dos.51-4.28), desire to help you sext (OR: 2.79; 95% CI: dos.01-step three.89), having fun with Instagram (OR: step 1.89; 95% CI: step 1.16-step three.10), sex (OR: step 1.82; 95% CI: 1.37-dos.41), playing with Snapchat (OR: step 1.61; 95% CI: 1.21-dos.14), sexting normalisation (OR: 1.49; 95% CI: step 1.20-1.86) and years (OR: 1.26; 95% CI: step one.step 12-step 1.41) have been significantly linked to choosing engagement.
Regarding “third-class forwarding” model, playing with Instagram (OR: dos.74; 95% CI: step one.1six-6.51), determination to sext (OR: dos.00; 95% CI: step one.48-2.72), sex (OR: step 1.96; 95% CI: 1.32-2.91), having an enchanting/sexual companion (OR: step one.86; 95% CI: step one.29-dos.68), using Myspace (OR: 1.53; 95% CI: step one.03-dos.26), sexting normalisation (OR: step one.43; 95% CI: 1.09-step one.87) and you may many years (OR: step one.43; 95% CI: step one.22-step one.66) were somewhat regarding involvement inside third-class forwarding.
From the “getting via an intermediary” design, using Instagram (OR: 2.step one6; 95% CI: 1.47-step 3.19), sexting normalisation (OR: step 1.84; 95% CI: 1.52-dos.24), with an intimate/sexual mujeres americanas vs europeas spouse (OR: step 1.7step one; 95% CI: 1.35-dos.17), gender (OR: 1.4step 1; 95% CI: step 1.step onestep one-1.80) and you can age (OR: step 1.36; 95% CI: step one.23-1.49) was indeed significantly related to wedding into the choosing thru an intermediary.
Gender variations
The brand new regression habits had been significant. Nagelkerke’s Roentgen 2 was .fifty for females and you will .41 to have men into “sending” model; .29 for women and .29 to have people on “receiving” model; .18 for girls and you can .24 getting men toward “third-party forwarding” model; and you may .fourteen for females and .twenty-two having boys towards “receiving thru an intermediary” design (Dining table cuatro:
Throughout the “sending” design, for females, readiness so you’re able to sext (OR: ; 95% CI: -), that have an intimate/intimate lover (OR: 4.54; 95% CI: 2.27-9.09) and you may many years (OR: step 1.60; 95% CI: step 1.17-dos.20) were significantly regarding sending involvement. Having guys, these people were desire in order to sext (OR: six.05; 95% CI: step 3.68-nine.94), that have a romantic/intimate mate (OR: dos.79; 95% CI: step 1.59-4.88) and using Snapchat (OR: dos.38; 95% CI: 1.32-4.29).
Throughout the “receiving” design, for females, willingness so you can sext (OR: 5.11; 95% CI: dos.57-), having fun with Instagram (OR: cuatro.34; 95% CI: step one.43-), having an enchanting/intimate companion (OR: 3.77; 95% CI: dos.49-5.72), sexting normalisation (OR: 1.62; 95% CI: 1.13-dos.33) and you will many years (OR: 1.42; 95% CI: step one.step 17-1.72) was basically notably about searching wedding. For men, they certainly were that have an intimate/sexual partner (OR: dos.97; 95% CI: dos.08-4.25), desire to sext (OR: 2.32; 95% CI: 1.58-step 3.41), playing with Snapchat (OR: dos.03; 95% CI: step 1.38-2.91), sexting normalisation (OR: step 1.40; 95% CI: step 1.06-step 1.86) and ages (OR: step one.20; 95% CI: step 1.04-step 1.38).